Every church ought to have the best possible sexual abuse prevention policies in their children’s ministry. These should be followed closely and reviewed regularly. But what happens when evil slips through the cracks of even the best policies and procedures? How does the church respond then? How should the church care for the victim, the victim’s parents, the alleged perpetrator, and cooperate with the legal authorities?
What is most frightening is that by the time a child molester gets caught he/she has on average 50-100 victims. How does the church find and care for the other children who have likely been abused? How does the church communicate with its people, community, and media who all want answers when these tragedies occur?
How is the situation different when the sexual abuse is by a minor against a minor instead of by an adult against a minor?
These are sickening questions. Unfortunately, they are so uncomfortable that most churches have not attempted to answer them. These questions go on the list of policies every church needs and no church has.
After 8 years of serving as a counselor at a parachurch counseling center, I came to The Summit Church in January of 2011. While in the parachurch setting I was contacted by several churches facing this type of scenario (both adult-to-minor abuse and minor-to-minor abuse). It was scary and painful to try to provide guidance. Answers were hard and time was short. The victim and family often got lost in just trying to figure out what could-should be done.
No doubt the churches’ confusion added to the physical, emotional, and spiritual trauma of these children and families.
When I got to The Summit Church this was an early priority for me. I did not want to relive this trauma from the inside. I started asking churches if they had a policy to provide guidance in these situations. The repeated answer was, “No, but we’d love a copy of yours when you write it.” Even when I contacted churches who had experienced this tragedy, the answer was the same.
The only piece of guidance I was able to find was a podcast at CCEF. I tell the back story of this policy for two reasons. First, I want to acknowledge this is our “best effort” and will likely need amendment. Second, I want to learn if similar policies exist that we could learn from in refining this one.
So over the next year I began drafting the policy below and consulting with attorneys, pastors, counselors, social workers, medical professionals, and elementary teachers to refine what a “Sexual Abuse Response Policy” should look like for a local church. Many people were extremely gracious in donating their time and expertise.
I would like to especially thank Renee Hill (RN, Clinical Assistant Professor and Undergraduate Clinical Site Coordinator at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing), Darin Meece (P.A.), Phil Monroe, Alex Quigley (Elementary School Principal), and Karla Siu (LCSW, Masters in Social Work from UNC Chapel Hill) for their contributions.
This policy is being shared publicly to serve as a resource for churches. Sexual abuse against children is frequent enough that the church must be prepared to respond. The well-being of children is at stake. The faith of generations in a family and entire communities are at stake.
Recent events at Penn State demonstrate why a church or other institution must have policies in place to provide guidance for these kinds of situations. In the absence of a pre-determined plan, fear and self-protection are strong influences upon decision making in this kind of crisis.
This policy is crafted primarily for the state of North Carolina. It should not be assumed that the laws and statutes of other states are the same. A legal review of this policy should be conducted before any version of this policy is adopted by a church to ensure that the leaders of that church understand what liabilities and responsibilities they bear.
With that said, it is my prayer that this policy will allow many churches to effectively represent Christ at a time of immense crisis. I pray that the trauma of many children and families will be lessened as God’s people are prepared to respond to one of the greatest tragedies of our day.
I ask that everyone who reads this policy to pray regularly for the protection of children. We know this is very near the heart of God (Matt. 18:6) and our discomfort with the subject should not rob these children of our prayers.
Policy in PDF Form: Response Plan for Sexual Abuse Against a Minor at XYZ Church


A friend I know from years ago is a professor at the University of Nebraska and wrote this book on child abuse in the church a couple of years ago. I haven’t personally read it yet, but if I know her it is definitely worth a read!
http://www.dovesnest.net/letthechildrencome
Thank you for the recommendation.
Thanks for writing regarding the aftermath of tragedy. Having been through a horrific allegation of sexual abuse in a mega-church and having to deal with the aftermath burned me out. I discovered that some church liability insurers have not only risk management procedures that are comprehensive on the preventive side, but can also furnish referrals of competent individuals that can help with the aftermath as well. I would recommend submitting whatever documents you intend to use to your church’s legal counsel and to your insurer to get their input. Then you need to begin the process of educating ministry staff and volunteers on how to deal with this and keep children safe in a corrupt world. Wise as serpents, innocent as doves guides our ministry to the young of all ages.
Jerry — I agree with your advisement. On the bottom of page 5 in this policy we recommend that the church contact their liability insurance provider for advisement.
What happens if the alleged perpetrator is found innocent? Have you thought about how to restore that brother/sister to the community? Suggestions like that can plague a person. If they were a gifted Sunday School teacher are they forever barred from teaching? I don’t have the right answer, I’m just trying to think this through.
Thanks for all of your work!
That is an important question, but outside the scope of this policy.
Contact with the offender before law enforcement initiates first contact can hinder proving up the case. By initiating offender contact you remove many valuable tools that law enforcement frequently uses to properly investigate these difficult cases. Your procedures are excellent, however initial offender contact should be deferred until law enforcement can fully act with a wide range of options.
As a retired police officer I have seen too many instances in the church setting which had poor outcomes because of poor timing.
The decision would be made by the SART to report and this would be communicated to the elders before the elders visited the alleged perpetrator. We have a statement that the elders would defer to the legal authorities about delaying that interaction if requested, but it could be made clearer. Excellent point.